Mystery wolf didn’t survive in Ӱԭ
October 10, 2012
10/7/2012
An Ӱԭ wolf that disappeared about 12,000 years ago just made another appearance.
No one will ever see this wolf, but scientists have found that it was different from Ӱԭ’s wolves of today, and it was not like its Ice-Age contemporaries that lived in, among other places, Los Angeles.
Blaire Van Valkenburgh is a UCLA researcher who lives and studies very close to the La Brea Tar Pits in downtown Los Angeles. She and her colleagues compared DNA from wolves that perished in Interior Ӱԭ during the last Ice Age with DNA from living wolves. The Ӱԭ DNA samples came from bones and skulls exposed by Fairbanks miners as they tore away frozen soil to get at gold-bearing gravels beneath. Staff members of the American Museum of Natural History came to Fairbanks from the 1920s to the 1940s to gather the bones and bring them back to the museum in New York.
The Ӱԭ wolves surprised the researchers by being unlike the wolves running around Ӱԭ right now. By looking at the DNA from wolf teeth attached to the skulls found in the permafrost (samples from teeth do the least damage to skulls), the scientists found the Ӱԭ wolves had no relationship to modern wolves.
This means that Ӱԭ wolves may have died off with woolly mammoths and saber-toothed cats at the end of the last Ice Age. Scientists had thought that wolves survived that grim period, but the wolves found in the permafrost near Fairbanks probably left no descendents according to Van Valkenburgh’s study. Ӱԭ’s wolves of today are probably the relatives of wolves that rode out the last Ice Age south of the great ice sheets and trotted their way back north as the ice melted.
The recently discovered extinct Ӱԭ wolf had a broader head and shorter nose than today’s version, and from wolves that died in the La Brea Tar Pits. The Ӱԭ wolf’s jaws were wider too, suggesting it could make the most of its meals by popping femurs in half to get at the sweetness inside.
“Relatively deep jaws are characteristic of habitual bone crackers, such as spotted hyenas,” wrote the scientists, including Van Valkenburgh and Jennifer Leonard of the University of Uppsala, in an article in Current Biology. The extinct Ӱԭ wolves would be better equipped to both taking large prey and scavenging, the researchers wrote.
Paul Matheus, formerly of the Ӱԭ Quaternary Center, once suggested that one of the largest meat-eaters in Ice-Age Ӱԭ, the giant, short-faced bear that disappeared around the same time as the ancient wolf, might have been a full-time scavenger.
Van Valkenburgh said she thinks the ancient wolves killed some of their own meals and also scavenged carcasses on the grassland landscape.
“I don’t think they would be straight scavengers,” Van Valkenburgh said. “It isn’t guaranteed you would find something dead to eat every day.”
She said full-time scavenging makes sense only for creatures like vultures, which can ride thermals for long periods of time to look for food.
“For an animal that has to walk, it’s not energetically efficient to be a scavenger,” she said.
However the ancient Ӱԭ wolf got its meals, it apparently couldn’t get enough of them about 12,000 years ago. Then began a sad few thousand years when there were no wolf howls in the Ӱԭ night.
Since the late 1970s, the University of Ӱԭ Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute has provided this column free in cooperation with the UAF research community. Ned Rozell is a science writer for the Geophysical Institute. This column first appeared in 2007.